Notebook.ai

Deleted user April 25, 2019

That's….so true though?

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Jyn or myself?

Deleted user April 25, 2019

Dumbledore is kind of a sack of shit and it's more confirmed now with how he treats Newt in the Fantastic Beast movies.
He manipulates everyone around him like chess pieces.

Deleted user April 25, 2019

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

It is a fair point.

Deleted user April 25, 2019

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

You can't ignore Fantastic Beasts! Rowling wrote them. They're canon!

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Well I also ignore Magnus Chase so that tells you where I am. I am far more invested in the work than the author.

@The-N-U-T-Cracker April 25, 2019

I call fake news.

@Moxie April 25, 2019

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

I call fake news.

L.O.L.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

Spoiler - click to show.

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

You can't ignore Fantastic Beasts! Rowling wrote them. They're canon!

Also Fantastic Beasts is amazing and I will defend it until the day I die. Those films got me into writing, they gave me a hero LIKE ME to look up to (unlike so many other films) with an autistic lead who wasn't a 2D stereotype and is basically the male character that everyone needs in today's world, and quite literally saved my life.

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

Thanks!

@Moxie April 25, 2019

(Oh crap I should've put that in spoilers. Lemme fix it)

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

God Tier Dumbledore is AVPM Dumbledore and y'all can't change my mind.

@Moxie April 25, 2019

Everyone is God Tier in AVPM and ya'll can't change my mind

@Moxie April 25, 2019

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

Spoiler - click to show.

Spoiler - click to show.

@Queen_Cuisine April 25, 2019

I'm one of those awful people who loves to speculate alternate scenarios in both history and fiction.

"Yer not special Harry."

3, 2, 1 Debate

Deleted user April 25, 2019

Everyone is God Tier in AVPM and ya'll can't change my mind

AVPS Umbridge tho is my spirit animal.

Deleted user April 25, 2019

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

Spoiler - click to show.

Spoiler - click to show.

Spoiler - click to show.

Harry could have been raised by any other magical family related to him and it would have had the same effect. Where are Harry's grand parents on the Potter side? Hmmmm?
Let's not forget that Dumbledore knew Sirius was innocent and let him rot in Azkaban for 12 years, instead of professing/ testifying his innocence and letting him raise Harry as a Godfather should have. (~~Lupin too~~)
There were so many other options that Harry could have had that was not completely messed up and horrible. Harry is lucky he didn't turn out a complete slug for Voldy to murder casually, because let's be honest most children from abusive homes do not turn out brave and honorable from the get go without massive amounts of therapy.

Deleted user April 25, 2019

I'm one of those awful people who loves to speculate alternate scenarios in both history and fiction.

"Yer not special Harry."

3, 2, 1 Debate

I mean…..He's really not.

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

Everyone is God Tier in AVPM and ya'll can't change my mind

You're right and you should say it.
They added a lot of depth to Quirrell as well!!

@amber_is_in_a_loop April 25, 2019

Everyone is God Tier in AVPM and ya'll can't change my mind

i smell starkid

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

I'm one of those awful people who loves to speculate alternate scenarios in both history and fiction.

"Yer not special Harry."

3, 2, 1 Debate

Same.
I was working on a fanfic where Harry had been killed by Voldemort as a baby (Snape went with Voldy and blocked Lily from getting in front of Harry) and then Lily and the Order head a rebellion against Voldemort, who responds by torching #12 and the Burrow, among other locations so the rebellion dies down. It centered on the remaining Weasleys/Order, and a group of resilient muggles and muggle-borns led by Hermione Granger in a semi post-apocolyptic setting, because Voldy.

Deleted user April 25, 2019

DDDDDDDaymn

@Queen_Cuisine April 25, 2019

I'm one of those awful people who loves to speculate alternate scenarios in both history and fiction.

"Yer not special Harry."

3, 2, 1 Debate

Same.
I was working on a fanfic where Harry had been killed by Voldemort as a baby (Snape went with Voldy and blocked Lily from getting in front of Harry) and then Lily and the Order head a rebellion against Voldemort, who responds by torching #12 and the Burrow, among other locations so the rebellion dies down. It centered on the remaining Weasleys/Order, and a group of resilient muggles and muggle-borns led by Hermione Granger in a semi post-apocolyptic setting, because Voldy.

That's actually a really cool concept. It really shows you how one slightly altered event can change an entire seven book (eight movie) series.

@evastardust RRAAAARRL April 25, 2019

RRAAAARRL

I wrote 1 chapter and then got distracted because ADD is so fun.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Oh. My. Gosh. Relatable.

@Althalosian-is-the-father April 25, 2019

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

Spoiler - click to show.

Spoiler - click to show.

Spoiler - click to show.

Harry could have been raised by any other magical family related to him and it would have had the same effect. Where are Harry's grand parents on the Potter side? Hmmmm?
Let's not forget that Dumbledore knew Sirius was innocent and let him rot in Azkaban for 12 years, instead of professing/ testifying his innocence and letting him raise Harry as a Godfather should have. (~~Lupin too~~)
There were so many other options that Harry could have had that was not completely messed up and horrible. Harry is lucky he didn't turn out a complete slug for Voldy to murder casually, because let's be honest most children from abusive homes do not turn out brave and honorable from the get go without massive amounts of therapy.

Spoiler - click to show.

Debate. Debate. Debate.