teach me about communism, i'm quite interested my friends

Poor choice of words I admit. Perhaps, we are by education self centered then. rather, what I was trying to say is Communism is extremely Idealistic, and pretty difficult if not impossible to execute.

In this lifetime, it can't be executed. I'm not saying we can make such a drastic change. But if we can work towards it isn't that a good thing?

Depending on what you think to be a good thing yeah. I have reservations about it because it's a very easily corrupted system. In theory, it's great, but I don't see any way of it working long term, I don't have that much faith in humanity.
I agree with Dom

Poor choice of words I admit. Perhaps, we are by education self centered then. rather, what I was trying to say is Communism is extremely Idealistic, and pretty difficult if not impossible to execute.

In this lifetime, it can't be executed. I'm not saying we can make such a drastic change. But if we can work towards it isn't that a good thing?

Depending on what you think to be a good thing yeah. I have reservations about it because it's a very easily corrupted system. In theory, it's great, but I don't see any way of it working long term, I don't have that much faith in humanity.
I agree with Dom

I do have a lot of faith in humanity and I'm a pessimist! My faith in humanity is the one thing I refuse to give up, and you should get yours back,

Anyways I'm going to bed because my mom is having surgery tomorrow and I need to help her with stuff after that.

An anthropologist on Coursera mentioned that what is usually called Communism is too authoritarian in practice to be considered "true Communism" (that is, how the term is used in an anthropological context.)

The main issue I find with it is—maybe a bit meta—how the best idea (like, "maybe don't brutally and ruthlessly exploit people") or change in system will develop a sort of corrupting programme of its own—this doesn't mean "so don't do anything to change anything because nothing will change", but rather that I think we should be able to examine the mission drift in what became of Communism so as to avoid similar corruption of ideals.

Angie Speaks on YouTube I believe coined the phrase "social capital" to describe the liberal appropriation of social justice that depends on elite intersections of privilege to raise awareness and represent…which is great, I've learned plenty from those conversations, but by the nature of how those are set up (needs be popular) and the limits of them (concerned mostly with awareness, thought, and microaggression) it does not enact improvement on the lives of marginalized people in a material systematic sense.

This isn't directly about Communism in the 101 Basics sense, but I think something like that is what happened to the worst examples of Communism: Maybe it started out being for the empowerment of the people, but the need to accrue and then reserve power to get anything done became very attractive to harmful agents…whether that's social capital or capital capital, it was the attractiveness of power that everyone has but some people can't care if they wield harmfully as long as it keeps them on top.

So, I think the real 101 Basic is Eric Liu's lectures about civic power.

The TEDed version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_Eutci7ack
The pre-pandemic lecture version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd0JH1AreDw

I hope this helps!

Fairly certain what we think of as Communism is actually Socialism, but feel free to correct me
I'm by no means an authority on this topic

Fairly certain what we think of as Communism is actually Socialism, but feel free to correct me
I'm by no means an authority on this topic

They're very similar, and used to be used interchangeably in the past. Communism is a type of Socialism in some cases, I believe. Most Communism can be categorized as Socialism but not all Socialism can be called Communism. I am also not an expert, but in my experience and limited education, that's what I believe it is.

Capitalism sucks. But it's not like it's the root of what's wrong with society.

Name one thing that we can all agree is an issue with society that isn't either directly caused or exacerbated and upheld by capitalism

Lack of understanding/tolerance between people maybe

Actually, Capitalism is biased against the success of entire demographics (Capitalism has a lot of racist, sexist, homophobic, ableist, etc history and could be considered inherently all those things aqs it comes mainly from greed, and we know who in society is considered greediest-) and often pushes harmful propaganda as such. Now, that's clearly not all of it, but Capitalism is inherently manipulative so… eesh yeesh.

Babes u realize capitalism is the reason we have racism, right?

I believe this is true because I watched a video citing a historical farmer's(?) uprising/revolt after which the landowners decided that they'd split up the working classes by race to pit them against each other—but if you have a link to that event or other that I can pull up for future "saucepls" that would be awesomesauce. I can't find the video anymore and I don't remember what this event was called or when it happened.

But if it's not what I'm thinking, that there came to be a rationalization to racialize slavery rather than keep it to general xenophobia/imperialism or insular religious supremacy (like oppressing the Other on the basis of being "heathens" more than for what they look like) because there's was a systemic monetary benefit… I'd believe it too but understand the need to elaborate.