Are you fucking serious Dom? I would say do your own fucking research but we all know you're going to purposefully search for biased answers that align to yourself only
Excuse me but you are entirely incorrect and avoiding obvious facts and logical jumps.
You've done it before, so I can only assume you'll do it again. You really like to repeat yourself.
Tu quoque is a logical fallacy. Just because I did something wrong doesn't mean you are right.
I didn't claim that now, did I.
It assumes that evolution is a fact when it has not been proven.
Evolution is a fact you blind twat. You just have your head so far buried in somewhat old texts that you disregard years and years of scientific study and fossil records that have already proven it. You just don't want science and religion to coexist when it clearly has for quite some time.
For your information, scientific study would not exist if it were not for religion.
Where's your proof?
And if you find yourself wondering why I'm being so hostile, take a look at the title of this chat. I'm done having to constantly read your incompetency when it comes to literally all things science and it's almost hilarious that someone can be this ignorant.
Well I do have a life goal of making others laugh.
It assumes that evolution is a fact when it has not been proven.
Evolution is a fact you blind twat. You just have your head so far buried in somewhat old texts that you disregard years and years of scientific study and fossil records that have already proven it. You just don't want science and religion to coexist when it clearly has for quite some time.
For your information, scientific study would not exist if it were not for religion.
Where's your proof?
History books.
And if you find yourself wondering why I'm being so hostile, take a look at the title of this chat. I'm done having to constantly read your incompetency when it comes to literally all things science and it's almost hilarious that someone can be this ignorant.
Well I do have a life goal of making others laugh.
Pity. Where's your ambition?
Just think about how dinosaur like creatures have turned into chickens.
Yeah I don't believe that.
:O
But…the evidence….is there?
Are you fucking serious Dom? I would say do your own fucking research but we all know you're going to purposefully search for biased answers that align to yourself only
Excuse me but you are entirely incorrect and avoiding obvious facts and logical jumps.
You've done it before, so I can only assume you'll do it again. You really like to repeat yourself.
Tu quoque is a logical fallacy. Just because I did something wrong doesn't mean you are right.
I didn't claim that now, did I.
True. Yet instead of defending yourself or attacking my statement you simply said that I did bad stuff too.
It assumes that evolution is a fact when it has not been proven.
Evolution is a fact you blind twat. You just have your head so far buried in somewhat old texts that you disregard years and years of scientific study and fossil records that have already proven it. You just don't want science and religion to coexist when it clearly has for quite some time.
For your information, scientific study would not exist if it were not for religion.
Where's your proof?
History books.
Cite it.
Do all plants respond to stimuli?
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss how do you think they pollinate?
Oh how foolish of me. Pray forgive my forgetfulness.
I just thought I would remind you. Think of that as an aside and not an actual comment. :P
Just think about how dinosaur like creatures have turned into chickens.
Yeah I don't believe that.
:O
But…the evidence….is there?
Direct me to it.
And if you find yourself wondering why I'm being so hostile, take a look at the title of this chat. I'm done having to constantly read your incompetency when it comes to literally all things science and it's almost hilarious that someone can be this ignorant.
Well I do have a life goal of making others laugh.
Pity. Where's your ambition?
Explain?
Like is that your only life goal? Cuz if it is, that's kinda sad.
Do all plants respond to stimuli?
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss how do you think they pollinate?
Oh how foolish of me. Pray forgive my forgetfulness.
I just thought I would remind you. Think of that as an aside and not an actual comment. :P
Of course mi amiga.
And if you find yourself wondering why I'm being so hostile, take a look at the title of this chat. I'm done having to constantly read your incompetency when it comes to literally all things science and it's almost hilarious that someone can be this ignorant.
Well I do have a life goal of making others laugh.
Pity. Where's your ambition?
Explain?
Like is that your only life goal? Cuz if it is, that's kinda sad.
Well if it was I would still be doing a great deal more for the world than many others are. But I have far more ideas and goals than that.
History books aren't always accurate depictions. "History is written by the winner." and what not
It assumes that evolution is a fact when it has not been proven.
Evolution is a fact you blind twat. You just have your head so far buried in somewhat old texts that you disregard years and years of scientific study and fossil records that have already proven it. You just don't want science and religion to coexist when it clearly has for quite some time.
For your information, scientific study would not exist if it were not for religion.
Where's your proof?
History books.
Cite it.
No. Do some research. Universities were pretty much invented by the Catholic church.
And if you find yourself wondering why I'm being so hostile, take a look at the title of this chat. I'm done having to constantly read your incompetency when it comes to literally all things science and it's almost hilarious that someone can be this ignorant.
Well I do have a life goal of making others laugh.
Pity. Where's your ambition?
Explain?
Like is that your only life goal? Cuz if it is, that's kinda sad.
Well if it was I would still be doing a great deal more for the world than many others are. But I have far more ideas and goals than that.
Ah. Good.
History books aren't always accurate depictions. "History is written by the winner." and what not
Fair. But I have yet to see anyone else say otherwise. I haven't looked hard enough though.
Just think about how dinosaur like creatures have turned into chickens.
Yeah I don't believe that.
:O
But…the evidence….is there?Direct me to it.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-birds-evolved-from-dinosaurs-20150602/
And there was a study at Kent, but for the life of me I cannot find ittttttt.
History books aren't always accurate depictions. "History is written by the winner." and what not
Fair. But I have yet to see anyone else say otherwise. I haven't looked hard enough though.
no one has survived to say otherwise.
Im sure your Big Book would have been vastly different if written by JC himself.
Thanks! Unfortunately it might take me a while to read. Work and such. Sorry!
History books aren't always accurate depictions. "History is written by the winner." and what not
Fair. But I have yet to see anyone else say otherwise. I haven't looked hard enough though.
no one has survived to say otherwise.
Im sure your Big Book would have been vastly different if written by JC himself.
What does that have to do with? The Bible doesn't cover like anything after the first hundred years after the death of Christ.
No worries. Just examples of my superior know how. :P
History books aren't always accurate depictions. "History is written by the winner." and what not
Fair. But I have yet to see anyone else say otherwise. I haven't looked hard enough though.
no one has survived to say otherwise.
Im sure your Big Book would have been vastly different if written by JC himself.
What does that have to do with? The Bible doesn't cover like anything after the first hundred years after the death of Christ.
Oh no that was just my example. If the loser of the biblical story (JC– although it's weird to call him the 'loser'. but he died so….) had written it himself instead of having others write it and then it get edited by crazy people (and the winners that felt bad about winning), I'm sure the stories and lessons within it's pages would be vastly different.
It assumes that evolution is a fact when it has not been proven.
Evolution is a fact you blind twat. You just have your head so far buried in somewhat old texts that you disregard years and years of scientific study and fossil records that have already proven it. You just don't want science and religion to coexist when it clearly has for quite some time.
For your information, scientific study would not exist if it were not for religion.
Where's your proof?
History books.
Cite it.
No. Do some research. Universities were pretty much invented by the Catholic church.
Wikipedia has spoken. I see what you mean now but that still doesn't negate the original offense. Not to mention that back then it wasn't one religion doing all of the discovering, it was all of them. All religions discovered at least one aspect about science. That should speak for itself of its universal improtance to all beings.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/AUZSj0hWus5SSHgNtBmb5msHt85GIoalKtcy_kfHqotigNWtuguycAU/ Figured it might be fun to toss this in here, while it's on the topic
(and then the church burned scientists…)
Oh my gosh those first two are so stupid. Loving this rudeness chat.
^^Oof. Idk if that is true (not saying it's not) but it wasn't about the science itself.
Wikipedia has spoken. I see what you mean now but that still doesn't negate the original offense. Not to mention that back then it wasn't one religion doing all of the discovering, it was all of them. All religions discovered at least one aspect about science. That should speak for itself of its universal improtance to all beings.
"The original offence." Whatevs yo.
I mean, the first two have a fair enough point..
